🔗 Share this article

When dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained trapped in a windowless conference room, oblivious whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in strained discussions, with numerous ministers representing various coalitions of countries ranging from the least developed nations to the richest economies.

Patience wore thin, the air stifling as exhausted delegates acknowledged the harsh reality: there would not be a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The 30th UN climate conference faced the brink of total collapse.

The sticking point: Fossil fuels

Research has demonstrated for more than a century, the CO2 emissions produced by burning fossil fuels is heating up our planet to alarming levels.

Nevertheless, during over three decades of annual climate meetings, the essential necessity to halt fossil fuel use has been addressed only once – in a agreement made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "move beyond fossil fuels". Officials from the Gulf states, Russia, and a few other countries were determined this would not be repeated.

Increasing pressure for change

At the same time, a increasing coalition of countries were equally determined that advancement on this issue was crucially important. They had developed a plan that was attracting increasing support and made it apparent they were prepared to hold firm.

Less wealthy nations strongly sought to advance on securing economic resources to help them manage the increasingly severe impacts of extreme weather.

Breaking point

In the pre-dawn period of Saturday, some delegates were prepared to leave and cause breakdown. "We were close for us," commented one government representative. "I was prepared to walk away."

The breakthrough happened through discussions with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, senior representatives left the main group to hold a private conversation with the chief Saudi negotiator. They urged wording that would indirectly acknowledge the global commitment to "move beyond fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unanticipated resolution

As opposed to explicitly referencing fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the Dubai agreement". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation surprisingly agreed to the wording.

The room showed visible relief. Cheers erupted. The settlement was done.

With what became known as the "Amazon accord", the world took a modest advance towards the gradual elimination of fossil fuels – a faltering, inadequate step that will barely interrupt the climate's ongoing trajectory towards disaster. But nevertheless a notable change from absolute paralysis.

Key elements of the agreement

• Alongside the subtle acknowledgment in the formal agreement, countries will commence creating a plan to gradually eliminate fossil fuels
• This will be primarily a non-binding program led by Brazil that will provide updates next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to remain below the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries achieved a tripling to $120bn of yearly funding to help them manage the impacts of climate disasters
• This sum will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "fair adjustment program" to help people working in high-carbon industries transition to the renewable industry

Varied responses

With global conditions approaches the brink of climate "irreversible changes" that could eliminate habitats and throw whole regions into crisis, the agreement was far from the "giant leap" needed.

"Cop30 gave us some modest progress in the correct path, but in light of the magnitude of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," stated one policy director.

This imperfect deal might have been the best attainable, given the international tensions – including a US president who shunned the talks and remains committed to oil and coal, the increasing presence of rightwing populism, continuing wars in multiple regions, extreme measures of inequality, and global economic instability.

"Fossil fuel corporations – the fossil fuel giants – were finally in the crosshairs at the climate summit," comments one policy convener. "We have crossed a threshold on that. The platform is open. Now we must convert it to a actual pathway to a more secure planet."

Major disagreements revealed

While nations were able to applaud the official adoption of the deal, Cop30 also exposed significant divisions in the primary worldwide framework for addressing the climate crisis.

"UN negotiations are consensus-based, and in a time of global disagreements, unanimity is ever harder to reach," commented one global leader. "I cannot pretend that Cop30 has achieved complete success that is needed. The disparity between where we are and what research requires remains concerningly substantial."

Should the world is to avert the most severe impacts of climate collapse, the global discussions alone will not be nearly enough.